Judge suspends Trump gag order in New York fraud trial - Los Angeles Times
Advertisement

Judge temporarily lifts gag order barring Trump from maligning court staff in fraud trial

Former President Trump holds his hands out in front of him while people stand behind him.
Former President Trump speaks outside a courtroom after testifying before the New York Supreme Court on Nov. 6.
(Eduardo Munoz Alvarez / Associated Press)
Share via

A gag order that barred former President Trump from commenting about court personnel after he disparaged a law clerk in his New York civil fraud trial was temporarily lifted Thursday by an appellate judge who raised free speech concerns.

Judge David Friedman of the state’s intermediate appeals court issued what’s known as a stay — suspending the gag order and allowing the former president to speak freely about court staff while a longer appeals process plays out.

The trial judge, Arthur Engoron, imposed the gag order Oct. 3 after Trump posted a false comment about the judge’s law clerk to social media on the second day of the trial in New York Atty. Gen. Letitia James’ lawsuit. James alleges that Trump exaggerated his wealth on financial statements used to secure loans and make deals.

Advertisement

Engoron later fined Trump $15,000 for violating the gag order and expanded it to include his lawyers after they questioned clerk Allison Greenfield’s prominent role on the bench, where she sits alongside the judge, exchanging notes and advising him during testimony. Friedman’s ruling allows the lawyers to again comment about court staff.

At an emergency hearing Thursday, Friedman questioned Engoron’s authority to police what Trump says outside the courtroom. He also disputed the trial judge’s contention that restricting the 2024 Republican front-runner’s speech was necessary or the right remedy to protect his staff’s safety.

“Considering the constitutional and statutory rights at issue, an interim stay is granted,” Friedman said, announcing his decision as he scribbled it on a court order.

Advertisement

Special counsel Jack Smith had requested the order, saying that Trump’s barrage of social media and campaign trail claims may intimidate witnesses.

Oct. 16, 2023

The appellate court intervened after Trump’s lawyers filed a lawsuit against Engoron late Wednesday that challenged his gag order as an abuse of power. They sued the judge under a state law known as Article 78, which allows lawsuits over some judicial decisions.

Trump and his lawyers have been increasingly frustrated with Engoron presiding over the non-jury trial in James’ lawsuit. Trump, angered by a pretrial fraud ruling imperiling his real estate empire, has called him an “extremely hostile” judge. His lawyers Wednesday asked for a mistrial, citing evidence of “tangible and overwhelming” bias.

Trump and his lawyers have repeatedly criticized Greenfield, contending that the former judicial candidate is a partisan voice in Engoron’s ear. Both Greenfield and Engoron are Democrats.

Advertisement

Engoron did not address the gag order ruling in court Thursday afternoon. Regarding the mistrial motion, he gave James’ office until Dec. 8 to respond before he rules.

Donald Trump is pushing for his federal election interference trial in Washington to be televised, joining media outlets in the request.

Nov. 11, 2023

Several of Trump’s lawyers and state lawyers from James’ office left the Manhattan trial to attend the emergency hearing at a state appellate courthouse a couple miles away. They sat around a table in a conference room and argued for about 45 minutes before Friedman ruled.

Trump lawyer Christopher Kise lauded the temporary stay as the “right decision.”

Friedman has “allowed President Trump to take full advantage of his constitutional 1st Amendment rights to talk about bias in his own trial, what he’s seeing and witnessing in his own trial — which, frankly, everyone needs to see,” Kise said.

Trump didn’t wait long to lash out at Greenfield, calling her a “politically biased and out of control, Trump Hating Clerk” in a post to his Truth Social platform Thursday night.

A federal judge in Florida has declined for now to postpone former President Donald Trump’s classified documents trial

Nov. 10, 2023

Trump lawyer Alina Habba said she saw no reason to tell Trump to stay quiet about the clerk, telling reporters that James “is continuing to disparage” her client and that “both sides need to be able to speak.”

State lawyers and a court system lawyer representing Engoron urged the appellate judge to keep the gag order in place. They argued that the trial judge had taken a reasonable step to protect his staff amid increased threats to their safety.

Advertisement

Engoron and his staff have received hundreds of threatening and antisemitic phone calls and letters since the trial began Oct. 2, court system lawyer Lisa Evans said. She blamed Trump’s comments about Engoron and Greenfield for amplifying his supporters’ anger toward them. Greenfield is “playing Whac-A-Mole now trying to block her number,” Evans said.

“It’s not that Mr. Trump has directly issued threats to the staff and Judge Engoron; it’s that what he’s said has led his constituents” to make threats, Evans argued, comparing the potential effect to the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol riot and a violent attack on Democratic Rep. Nancy Pelosi’s husband, Paul, in their San Francisco home last year.

Ivanka Trump has taken the witness stand in the civil fraud trial that is publicly examining former President Trump’s family business.

Nov. 8, 2023

“That is not political speech. That is threatening behavior and it should be stopped,” Evans said.

Kise suggested the safety concerns were overblown, arguing that Engoron was using the guise of threats — and the “hobgoblins of ‘Trump’s a bad person and he says bad things’” — to keep the former president and his lawyers from questioning Greenfield’s influence on the trial.

Trump hasn’t threatened Greenfield, nor has he disclosed any personal information such as her home address, Kise said. Meanwhile, he noted, she’s routinely photographed sitting next to Engoron by media photographers and videographers covering the trial.

State lawyer Daniel Magy argued that Trump’s immense social media audience had made the clerk more of a target for threats. Trump’s offending social media post was based on a post by someone else who was followed by just a handful of people.

Advertisement

Both posts included a picture that Greenfield had publicly posted online of her with Senate Majority Leader Charles E. Schumer (D-N.Y.), but Trump added a falsehood about her personal life before sending it off to his millions of followers.

Advertisement