Vatican cardinal accused in financial crimes case says he can’t get a fair trial
VATICAN CITY — A Vatican cardinal on trial in the Holy See’s big financial crimes case alleged Friday that he can’t properly defend himself from “the nightmare of these accusations” because prosecutors have withheld key evidence from the defense.
Cardinal Angelo Becciu spoke out in court after Judge Giuseppe Pignatone rejected his lawyers’ latest appeal for access to the material. In a decree read aloud Friday, Pignatone sided with prosecutors who have argued that the redacted interrogation transcripts and WhatsApp chats are part of another investigation and must remain secret.
Becciu, once one of the most influential Vatican cardinals and a close aide to Pope Francis, said he maintained his faith in the Vatican tribunal but was “bitter” and “perplexed” by the judge’s decision.
“The defense has been demeaned — it cannot fully exercise the right of defense if it doesn’t have all the material,” he told the court.
Becciu is on trial along with nine other people in a sprawling case that is focused on the Vatican’s $375-million investment in a London property but also includes charges of embezzlement surrounding Becciu’s donation of Vatican funds to a charity run by his brother. Becciu has denied wrong- doing, as have the other defendants.
Pope Francis canceled meetings Friday because he was running a fever, the Vatican said, without releasing further details on the pontiff’s condition.
From the start, defense lawyers have complained that the Vatican’s legal code has deprived their clients of basic rights afforded defendants in modern countries. Even Francis’ role in the case — he modified the law four times in favor of prosecutors during the investigation — has been cited by defense lawyers as evidence that defendants can’t get a fair trial in an absolute monarchy where the pope wields supreme legislative, executive and judicial power.
Pignatone has routinely ruled against them and allowed the trial to go ahead.
The material prosecutors have withheld includes the full transcript of the interrogations of a key prosecution witness, Msgr. Alberto Perlasca, and 126 WhatsApp chats about him. Perlasca was the Vatican official most involved in the London property deal and had been a key suspect early on in the investigation. But he turned into the prosecution’s star witness in August 2020 when he changed his story and turned on Becciu, his former boss.
The chats were entered into evidence in November, after Perlasca revealed in court that he began cooperating with prosecutors after he received threats and advice from a woman, Francesca Chaouqui, who was known to have had a dispute with the cardinal.
Pope Francis has sent one of his top sex crimes investigators to Bolivia as the country confronts an escalating pedophilia scandal involving priests.
The suggestion that Chaouqui may have coached Perlasca to turn on Becciu to seek revenge against him threw into question the integrity of the investigation.
The WhatsApp chats were exchanges between Chaouqui and a Perlasca family friend. Becciu’s lawyers wanted access to them because they believed they could help show that Perlasca was manipulated into fabricating claims against the cardinal.
Prosecutor Alessandro Diddi entered the 126 texts into evidence but redacted 119 of them. Pignatone agreed Friday they would remain redacted, reasoning that prosecutors have the “unquestionable” right to keep secret evidence in an ongoing investigation.
Becciu voiced exasperation that he was on trial “suffering for three years, under the nightmare of these accusations” while Perlasca, Chaouqui and the family friend were free. Not only had they “plotted against me,” he said, but had implicated the pope in a vendetta by helping persuade him to fire Becciu and put him on trial.
“You cannot use the Holy Father to carry out such a malicious plan of revenge,” Becciu said.
Sign up for Essential California
The most important California stories and recommendations in your inbox every morning.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Los Angeles Times.
