Judge restores New York primary on June 23
NEW YORK — The New York Democratic presidential primary must take place June 23 because canceling it would be unconstitutional and deprive withdrawn presidential candidates Bernie Sanders and Andrew Yang of proper representation at the Democratic convention, a judge ruled Tuesday.
U.S. District Judge Analisa Torres in Manhattan ruled after lawyers for Sanders and Yang argued Monday that the candidates otherwise would be harmed irreparably.
The judge said there was enough time before the primary occurs to figure out how to carry it out safely. She acknowledged that the reason it was canceled — to prevent the spread of COVID-19 — was an important state interest but said she was unconvinced it justified infringing rights, especially since every voter can use an absentee ballot. She noted that no other state had canceled its primary.
Torres wrote that removing presidential contenders from the primary ballot deprived them of votes for the Democratic Party’s nomination. She said it also diminished the delegates’ influence on the party’s platform and their ability to react to unexpected convention developments.
It also “deprived Democratic voters of the opportunity to elect delegates who could push their point of view in that forum,” she said. “The loss of these 1st Amendment rights is a heavy hardship.”
The Democratic members of the state’s Board of Elections voted to cancel the primary even though New York was still planning to hold its congressional and state-level primaries June 23.
Toss-up contests from Arizona to Florida hold the key for President Trump and Joe Biden.
They cited the danger to voters from the coronavirus outbreak as a reason to cancel the election since former Vice President Joe Biden has been endorsed by the major candidates he had faced.
The fact that the primary was going to occur on June 23 anyway because of other contested races, including a number of congressional primaries, led Torres to question Monday why the primary wasn’t canceled entirely if safety was such a concern.
Asked for reaction, New York state Democratic Party Chair Jay Jacobs said: “We are reviewing it.”
Jacobs had called holding the primary “unnecessary” with the suspension of Sanders’ campaign and said reduced turnout could reduce the need for as many poll workers.
State Board of Elections spokesman John Conklin said: “No comment at this time. Our lawyers are reviewing the decision.”
Biden’s campaign declined to comment. The campaign has kept its distance from the situation, not wanting to become embroiled in a new fight over nearly 300 delegates to the summer convention and saying the campaign didn’t ask for the primary to be scrapped.
Biden became the presumptive nominee when Sanders suspended his campaign last month, but Sanders had made clear that he wanted to continue collecting delegates from remaining primaries, including in New York, to maximize his influence over the party platform and other decisions at the Democratic convention this summer.
Biden’s campaign did not want to be seen as stepping on Sanders’ efforts to do that in a state like New York, where the Vermont senator maintains a significant following.
Sanders’ allies celebrated the ruling.
“Credit to Andrew Yang and all the grass-roots groups that have been carrying on the fight for democracy in New York,” said Larry Cohen, who chairs Our Revolution, an organization spun out of Sanders’ 2016 White House bid.
“Vote by mail is the answer to the pandemic,” Cohen continued, “not canceling the presidential primary when more than 80% of Democrats have other elections the same day.”
Sanders’ representatives, in a statement forwarded by attorney Arthur Schwartz, who argued before Torres, called the decision “an extraordinary victory for the democratic process here in New York, a state much in need of something to cheer about.”
Attorney Jeff Kurzon, representing Yang and congressional candidate Jonathan Herzog, also lauded the judge’s decision.
“We are fired up and up and ready to go vote on June 23!” he wrote in an email.
Get the L.A. Times Politics newsletter
Deeply reported insights into legislation, politics and policy from Sacramento, Washington and beyond. In your inbox three times per week.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Los Angeles Times.
