Rep. Adam Schiff enters race for California seat in Senate - Los Angeles Times
Advertisement

California Rep. Adam Schiff enters marquee Senate race

Adam Schiff speaking into a microphone from a dais behind a nameplate reading "Mister Schiff, Chairman."
Rep. Adam B. Schiff (D-Burbank) leading a congressional hearing in 2019.
(Kirk McKoy / Los Angeles Times)
Share via

Rep. Adam B. Schiff, a decades-long fixture in San Fernando Valley politics who rose to national prominence as a top Democratic foe to then-President Trump, announced Thursday that he is joining a contest for U.S. Senate that is quickly shaping up to be highly competitive.

A mild-mannered former prosecutor, Schiff initially built a profile in the House as a moderate Democrat focused on foreign policy and national security. The Trump era, however, thrust him into the spotlight, as he led the first impeachment of the then-president and served on the congressional panel investigating the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol attack that culminated in referring Trump to the Justice Department for criminal investigation.

For the record:

3:30 p.m. Jan. 26, 2023The caption on an earlier version of this article indicated the photo was taken last year. It was taken in 2019.

8:23 a.m. Jan. 26, 2023An earlier version of this article stated that Rep. Adam Schiff unseated a GOP state senator in 1996. Schiff won the election after defeating a Republican member of the state Assembly.

“The Senate is where many of these fights over the future of our democracy take place,” Schiff said in an interview prior to his campaign launch. “Some of Donald Trump’s biggest enablers are in the Senate. And I think that is where I can most effectively champion our democratic institutions.”

Advertisement

His campaign injects new fundraising and political heft into the race for the Senate seat currently occupied by Sen. Dianne Feinstein, the San Francisco Democrat who has held that office for 30 years.

Democratic Rep. Katie Porter, a rising star in the party who has notched close victories in competitive Orange County, was the first major candidate to declare her Senate candidacy, announcing her run earlier this month. Oakland Rep. Barbara Lee, a progressive Democrat, has told colleagues she also will launch a bid, although she has not yet done so publicly. Democratic Rep. Ro Khanna of Fremont also has signaled interest in running.

Though the race for Feinstein’s seat has begun in earnest, the senator, 89, has not disclosed whether she intends to seek reelection next year. Given some questions about her capacity to continue in that role, many observers expect she will not run for another six-year term.

Advertisement

Speaker Kevin McCarthy made good on his pledge to remove two California Democrats from the intelligence panel.

Jan. 24, 2023

“I have just tremendous respect for her and — more than respect — admiration and affection,” Schiff said, adding that he would not have jumped into the race without informing her first. He said they spoke the day before his announcement.

“I think she will make her own decision about an announcement when she feels ready to do so,” he said. “She’s earned that right, and I certainly respect her to do that whenever she determines the time is right.”

Feinstein had previously told The Times she would disclose her plans soon, “probably by spring.”

Advertisement

With Republicans having trouble mustering competitive candidates to run for statewide office, the fiercest battle is expected to be among the Democratic contenders, who broadly align on ideology.

“Since they do mostly fall in line in terms of policy, it’ll be a race more about personality and about brand,” said Kimberly Nalder, a Sacramento State University political scientist.

She pointed to Lee’s reputation as the lone vote in Congress against the invasion of Afghanistan in 2001, which “makes her a hero to the left,” Nalder said, but also reflects the position that a majority in the country now holds.

Porter, of Irvine, has emerged as an anti-corruption advocate with a populist streak and a whiteboard as her signature prop.

Schiff’s lawyerly demeanor is now best associated with the hearings for Trump’s impeachments and the Jan. 6 investigation.

“We saw in 2022 that democracy itself was a big issue for a lot of voters,” Nalder said. “He certainly was a very visible defender of democracy in those hearings, for those who paid attention.”

Advertisement

Schiff shared that assessment, telling The Times that his role “at the center of these fights to preserve democracy” differentiate him from his competitors. Those fights, he said, were also “interlinked” with voters’ concerns about the economy.

“The fact that the economy hasn’t been working for millions of Americans who have seen their quality of life decline ... led people to be receptive to a demagogue who comes with promises that he alone can fix it,” Schiff said. He cited climate change as another main campaign focus.

The road to elected office can be long and winding and is not always paved with the best of intentions.

July 27, 2017

His kickoff campaign video flaunts anti-endorsements from prominent right-wingers such as Trump — shown referring to the congressman derisively as “Little Pencil Neck” — and Fox News personality Tucker Carlson, who called him “unfit to hold office.”

Schiff’s record as a chief Trump antagonist landed him on the bestseller lists with a memoir, “Midnight in Washington: How We Almost Lost Our Democracy and Still Could.” He also parlayed the notoriety into a campaign cash juggernaut. He had more than $20 million on hand as of late November, putting him well ahead financially of his rivals in the Senate race. His campaign will not accept donations from corporate political action committees, a spokesperson said.

Porter pointed out Thursday that she had long held that stance.

“In the race for California’s U.S. Senate seat, I’m proud to be the only candidate who has never taken a dime of corporate PAC money,” read a Porter campaign email sent soon after Schiff’s announcement.

Porter has also shown fundraising prowess, pulling in more than $25 million for her last congressional campaign. But she spent heavily in the last cycle to fend off her Republican challenger, leaving her with $7.7 million in the bank after the election.

Advertisement

Lee, who has faced little competition in her deep-blue Oakland district, spent more than $2 million in her last campaign and ended with less than $55,000 in the bank.

For Schiff, 62, the statewide bid will mark the first time in 20 years he has faced a competitive race.

Born in Massachusetts and raised in Arizona and the Bay Area, Schiff moved to Los Angeles after law school to clerk for a federal judge. As a deputy in the U.S. attorney’s office, he successfully prosecuted Richard Miller, the first FBI agent to be indicted for espionage.

He then attempted to make the jump to elected office. Though a 1994 state Assembly run was unsuccessful, he won a GOP-held state Senate seat two years later.

Though now a Democratic stronghold, the intersection of the San Fernando and San Gabriel valleys — encompassing Burbank, Glendale and Pasadena — was friendlier territory for Republicans when Schiff first ran for Congress in 2000. He squared off against GOP Rep. James Rogan, who had bested Schiff six years earlier for an Assembly seat and had emerged in Congress as a central figure in the Republican impeachment of President Clinton.

Schiff won the hotly fought campaign, which shattered spending records for House races. Since then, he has routinely won reelection by margins of 30 to 50 points.

Advertisement

In 2001, the first-term congressman was preparing to go to work on Sept. 11 when the first plane struck the World Trade Center in New York; the terrorist attacks that day ended up shaping his course in Congress, pushing him to focus more on national security than other policy areas that had interested him, such as environmental issues or criminal justice reform.

“I thought that there aren’t that many people in the caucus, compared to other areas, who are focused on this,” he told The Times on the 20th anniversary of 9/11. “Maybe this is where I can add value.”

Schiff voted for the Iraq war authorization in 2002, as well as for the Patriot Act. Years later, he told The Times that an “overriding impact [of 9/11 and the ensuing years] is a recognition of the limitations of military power.”

As he rose in prominence in the House Intelligence Committee, he became a leading voice for seeking congressional authorization for military force against Islamic State and in favor of the Iran nuclear deal negotiated during the Obama administration.

Once described as “more labradoodle than Doberman,” Adam Schiff got tough on President Trump. That’s made him both a hero and a pariah.

Jan. 17, 2020

After becoming the top Democrat on the Intelligence Committee, he was a central figure in several investigations into Trump. He vocally drew attention to Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election, which was investigated by special counsel Robert S. Mueller III. Schiff’s prominence in the Trump investigations earned him derisive nicknames from the then-president and the ire of Republicans, who accused him of making exaggerated and politicized claims that Trump’s 2016 campaign had colluded with the Russian government.

Schiff became even more of a lightning rod as leader of the first impeachment inquiry into Trump. He presided over hearings that examined whether Trump tried to pressure the president of Ukraine to open an investigation into his potential rival Joe Biden in exchange for military aid. Trump was impeached by the Democratic-led House but was acquitted in the Senate.

Advertisement

A top ally of then-Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-San Francisco), Schiff reportedly considered following in her footsteps in a House Democratic leadership role. He ultimately decided to focus on a bid for the Senate instead.

His congressional workload may lighten considerably this term. House Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-Bakersfield) removed him this week from the Intelligence Committee, alleging that Schiff had lied about whether he knew the whistleblower whose complaint led to Trump’s first impeachment. (A Washington Post fact-check disputed McCarthy’s accusation.)

McCarthy, explaining his actions in a letter, said the Intelligence Committee under Schiff’s chairmanship “severely undermined its primary national security and oversight missions — ultimately leaving our nation less safe.”

McCarthy’s removal of Schiff as well as Rep. Eric Swalwell (D-Dublin) from the committee appeared to be in retaliation for Democrats leading the bipartisan effort to strip assignments from Reps. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) and Paul Gosar (R-Ariz.) for making incendiary comments including threats against their colleagues.

Schiff denounced the move as “destructive of the institution” of the intelligence panel. But he appeared to relish the chance to needle his fellow Californian, charging that McCarthy was more inclined to help the far-right flank of the Republican Party than his own state.

“There will certainly be a form of cosmic justice,” Schiff said, “when I become Kevin McCarthy’s home-state senator.”

Advertisement