Letters: Egypt and democracy - Los Angeles Times
Advertisement

Letters: Egypt and democracy

Egyptians wave national flags as fireworks light the sky at Tahrir Square after President Mohamed Morsi was ousted by the military.
(Amr Nabil / Associated Press)
Share via

Re “Army ousts Morsi,” July 4

It is unfortunate that the Egyptian people found it necessary to depose their new democratically elected government. However, the transition need not result in a denial of democracy.

As stated in the Declaration of Independence, “Whenever any form of government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their safety and happiness.”

Advertisement

A rapid transition back to a more responsive elected government could provide the Egyptian people with a better opportunity to achieve the goals enshrined in our Declaration of Independence.

Darrel Miller

Santa Monica

Advertisement

The people of Egypt didn’t lose faith in democracy; they didn’t care about democracy, or they didn’t get the concept.

They elected Mohamed Morsi. Even if they didn’t like him, the next election would have given them an opportunity to vote him out of office. That’s democracy. Instead, they protested in the streets. The coup was an opportunity the military could not pass up.

The lesson should be that elections matter, and the Egyptians should have thought more carefully about whom they were electing.

Advertisement

Stephany Yablow

North Hollywood

Opponents have many complaints about Morsi, but one is that while campaigning, he promised to share power, but once in office, he failed to do so.

Maybe Egypt has something to teach the world: If you make a campaign promise that is important, easy to keep and easy to verify, and then you fail to keep it, you will be forcibly removed from office.

Imagine that: taking campaign promises seriously, with an enforcer to hold politicians to their word.

Rodney Hoffman

Advertisement

Montecito Heights

Morsi seemed to have misunderstood the historic significance of his election last year. He was not chosen by the people to govern according to what the Muslim Brotherhood wants but rather to promote progress in education, the economy and the justice system and to seek tolerance for diversity in Egyptian social life.

It seems that because of his hubris and failure to see the harm he was doing to his country, Morsi’s days were numbered.

Paul L. Hovsepian

Sierra Made

Israel, far from being Egypt’s nemesis, can serve as its salvation. It was at once amusing and painful to see Muslim Brotherhood supporters scapegoating Israel by blaming the influence of U.S. aid to Egypt, with support for Israel as one motivating factor, for this week’s military coup.

Advertisement

Yet Israel’s example of how to reconcile political Judaism and democracy points the way for Egypt to honor the Muslim Brotherhood’s yearning for political Islam while protecting and empowering minorities.

As rough and tumble as Israeli democracy is, it works.

Roger Schwarz

Los Angeles

We must stop fetishizing elections. Yes, Morsi was elected (by a narrow margin); so was Hitler in 1933.

But once elected, Morsi ruled as a dictator, ignoring the opposition. Even many Muslims in Egypt understand now that Morsi simply couldn’t rule. Hence, the second revolution — this time, let us hope, one that will produce a truly democratic government.

To call this a step back is to ignore the dire situation in Egypt. How long were the Egyptian people supposed to wait?

Advertisement

Marjorie Perloff

Pacific Palisades

ALSO:

Letters: Making Earth inhospitable

Letters: Freer markets, cheaper rides

Mailbag: Angelenos on Mayor Garcetti

Advertisement
Advertisement