Mark Zuckerberg faces House judiciary vote on contempt of Congress citation - Los Angeles Times
Advertisement

Mark Zuckerberg faces House judiciary vote on contempt of Congress citation

A seated person is behind a microphone.
Facebook Chief Executive Mark Zuckerberg testifies before the House Financial Services Committee in Washington, D.C., on Oct. 23, 2019.
(Andrew Harnik / Associated Press)
Share via

Republicans on the House Judiciary Committee are preparing a contempt citation against Meta Chief Executive Mark Zuckerberg over an investigation into complaints that the social media company has censored conservative speech.

Committee Chairman Jim Jordan of Ohio, who has accused technology companies of working with the Biden administration, scheduled a vote Thursday on a recommendation to hold Zuckerberg in contempt. The full House would have to approve a contempt citation.

The contempt recommendation asserts Meta has largely ignored demands for internal documents covered by a subpoena issued in February and mostly furnished communications with the U.S. government and other external entities.

Advertisement

Andy Stone, a Meta spokesperson, said the company has “operated in good faith” in seeking to comply with “sweeping requests for information.”

“To date, we have delivered over 53,000 pages of documents — both internal and external — and have made nearly a dozen current and former employees available to discuss external and internal matters, including some scheduled this very week,” Stone said.

Inspired by the success of Netflix, Hollywood studios pursued Silicon Valley-style hypergrowth with tactics borrowed from the likes of Uber and Lyft.

July 21, 2023

The panel also issued subpoenas to the chief executives of Alphabet Inc., Amazon.com Inc., Apple Inc. and Microsoft Corp. for documents on their communications with the Biden administration.

Advertisement

Last week, Jordan sent a letter to Zuckerberg demanding information on Meta’s new social media platform Threads, and alleged that the committee has “obtained additional evidence that the federal government has coerced or colluded with technology, social media, and other companies to moderate content online.”

Advertisement