Charity Drive’s Bar to Advocacy Groups Upheld
WASHINGTON — Legal and political advocacy groups may be barred from receiving shares of donations to the annual charity drive among the federal government’s 4 million civilian and military employees, the Supreme Court ruled today.
By a 4-3 vote, the justices reversed a lower court’s ruling that forced the government to include such groups--as diverse as the National Assn. for the Advancement of Colored People’s Defense and Educational Fund and the National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation.
The decision is a victory for the Reagan Administration, which appealed the lower court ruling. It also represents a multimillion-dollar loss to groups that had sought access to the charity drive.
“The President could reasonably conclude,” Justice Sandra Day O’Connor wrote for the court, “that a dollar directly spent on providing food or shelter to the needy is more beneficial than a dollar spent on litigation that might or might not result in aid to the needy.”
‘Non-Public Forum’
Ruling that the federal charity drive--called the Combined Federal Campaign--is a “non-public forum,” the court said barring a group’s access to such a forum need only be reasonable--not the most reasonable or only reasonable limitation.
A wide array of legal and political advocacy groups had contended that barring their participation as recipients in the charity drive stifled their free-speech rights protected by the Constitution’s First Amendment.
More to Read
Get the L.A. Times Politics newsletter
Deeply reported insights into legislation, politics and policy from Sacramento, Washington and beyond. In your inbox three times per week.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Los Angeles Times.