Commentary: Treatment of the homeless smacks of segregation
The concept of segregation is nothing new, nor is the controversy surrounding it. The aim of setting someone or something apart can deeply divide those whose ideologies differ. I suppose it depends on who or what is being separated and the reasons why.
When I think about segregating people, the Eugenics movement comes to mind. The concept has to do with systematically isolating certain groups of people, devaluing their lives, dehumanizing them and ultimately eliminating them. Given recent events in the local news, I think the subject should be revisited, if for no other reason, to serve as a cautionary tale.
It is a fact that many who are homeless suffer from debilitating psychiatric conditions, physical disabilities and/or substance-abuse disorders. Some don’t have family. Others have fallen victim to the economy, displacing them in a world of poverty.
There are also those who flee abusers and the ravages of domestic violence only to find they have nowhere to go. All are vulnerable, marginalized and in need of outside support to reconnect to the community and rebuild their lives.
Social integration allows us to engage with them, offer support and provide guidance. Segregation, on the other hand, alienates and deprives.
Lately, I began reflecting on recent efforts to relocate a weekly picnic/potluck that serves the homeless here in Costa Mesa. It is held at Wilson Park, a location with lovely tall trees and green foliage. For some, the event serves as a respite from the stress of homeless life. As I understand it, the city originally suggested that the event be relegated indoors to a nearby church.
To their credit, picnic organizers declined moving indoors, opting instead to enjoy the outdoors and sunshine that a traditional picnic embodies. To the city’s credit, park rangers and police officers patrol the area and do their best to uphold the law and maintain safety and order.
In all honesty, it would be naïve to think that no criminals or addicts attend the picnic. The fact is that they do. I am acquainted with some of them and am aware of their addictions.
The deeper question here is how do we reconcile our need for safety and security without violating the civil rights of those who are estranged from society and who greatly benefit from participating in public activities that embrace social integration?
All life matters, and inclusion enhances our experience and enjoyment of it. We need to take care to support those among us who are marginalized, while refusing to enable illegal behaviors that are detrimental to society. It is a delicate balance, one that is worth achieving.
Freelance writer KATHY CLINKENBEARD lives in Costa Mesa.