Mailbag: A point of clarification regarding Measure Y

An error in the message by the “Yes on Measure Y” group in the Pilot on Saturday caught my eye [Advertisement, Page A5]. I smiled when I read that Newport’s general plan is called the “Resident’s plan” because we get to vote on any changes and updates.

To be factual, we have a Planning Commission and City Council that get to vote on what is built in our city. We resident citizens only must vote approval if the proposed change in land use exceeds 40,000 square feet of new development, 100 new residential units or 100 new peak hour vehicle trips. This right to vote on excessive development was granted by passing the “Greenlight Initiative” in 2000.

The proponents of Measure Y promise enticing benefits to the city, such as enhanced water quality and open space, that may be financed with one-time only development funds if measure Y passes. What they do not mention is that passing Measure Y will allow 550,000 square feet of additional commercial development, plus 500 additional residential units, both in Newport Center. Only through magical thinking could one believe that this development would reduce vehicle trips and enhance quality of life. Does the Corona del Mar bypass traffic plan even exist in Never-Never Land?

Since we residents do have the right to vote on excessive development, this expansion of business and homes in Newport Center has been buried in an appendix to the general plan update put on the ballot as Measure Y.

I will exercise my right and vote no on Y. Most of the rest of the general plan update is non-controversial, does not involve excessive development and can be approved by the City Council for the benefit of Newport residents and businesses.

Diane Baker

Newport Beach

*

I have concerns about traffic

I believe Newport Beach’s Measure Y will result in a lot of new development in Newport Center and the airport area, and thus in a lot of new traffic.

Don Harvey

Newport Beach

*

Measure is short-sighted

Measure Y is, of course, a deceptive way for the City Council to add massive new development to Newport Center and the airport area. The traffic that these developments will bring will add to the already near-gridlock condition of our roads during rush hour.

Those of us who are already residents will probably suffer through this, but what about the people who have a choice of where they relocate their home or come to vacation? The more difficult that we make it to get around, the less desirable we make Newport Beach as a final destination.

For a city that is very focused on the amenities that we offer, this is a short-sighted decision that has implications for the economic health of the whole city.

Tim Stoaks

Sana Ana Heights

*

Ramos is a good choice

I heard Lee Ramos is running for City Council. A few years younger than he, I grew up on the same street as Lee, Santa Isabel Avenue. His mom was the warmest, neatest mom I ever knew.

During junior high, Lee gave of his time to be a YMCA club counselor. He later hired me as assistant gym director at the old Boys Club near the Costa Mesa park. He came up with many creative ideas to draw the boys into the gym. That was a great summer for me.

I think Lee is more politically conservative than I am, but I’d vote for him with confidence. Lee has a bright and creative mind, and you would do well to have him help run the city. He loves the town, knows its history and the people who started this city, previously referred to as Goat Hill.

Bart Hinesly

Brookings, Ore.