Council to consider effects of Humanity
Deirdre Newman
Habitat for Humanity representatives will try to coax City Council
approval tonight of a low-income housing project in the College Park
neighborhood despite resident opposition and the Planning
Commission’s denial of the project.
The council will consider the eight-house development for a site
behind Harbor Center that the commission decided was appropriate for
residential use -- but not for the Habitat project. The majority of
commissioners denied the project because they believed the site was
either unsuitable for residential development or Habitat’s proposal
was too dense.
College Park residents oppose the project for a variety of
reasons, including fears that it will add to the already overcrowded
parking situation in their neighborhood and that the project is too
dense.
That leaves Mark Korando, vice president of site development of
Habitat for Humanity Orange County and a former city planning
commissioner, in the tough position of trying to show why Habitat
would be the perfect fit for the site.
“The Planning Commission, which is five people, has a viewpoint,
and the City Council may have a different viewpoint,” Korando said.
“We’re hoping that reason prevails.”
Habitat for Humanity is a Christian housing ministry that builds
and sells affordable houses and loans money for the mortgages to
low-income families. Its College Park proposal includes eight homes
with two-car garages, which must be used for parking on a 1.5-acre,
land-locked site comprising two properties -- one on Harbor Boulevard
and one on West Wilson Street.
But the proposed project does not fit the site, said Steve Fox,
who has lived on Wake Forest Drive, directly east of the project, for
the past 12 years.
“To me, it’s like a round peg trying to fit into a square hole,”
Fox said. “We’re not saying no. We just want [Habitat] to listen to
us here. Let’s get a good compromise.
Habitat has already compromised as much as it can, Korando said.
Its original plan was for 12 houses, but the organization reduced
that to eight, Korando said.
It can’t go any lower, because fewer than eight homes would not
provide an adequate financial return on the donation of the land to
ICI Development, which owns the properties and would donate them for
the Habitat for Humanity project, president Scott Bell said in
September.
The homes were designed to fit in with the neighborhood, Korando
said.
“The size of the original College Park homes is very close to the
size of the homes we’re proposing to build,” Korando said. “Those
were good starter homes for families, and [ours] are good starter
homes for families.”
Most of the site has served as a buffer between the shopping
center and the neighboring College Park residential community.
The site is walled in on three sides, which includes two 14-foot
portions -- one behind Home Depot and another on the east side, at
the end of Wake Forest Drive, between the site and some homes.
The eastern portion of the wall was required by a 1999 settlement
agreement among the city, ICI Development and neighbors to lessen
noise from Home Depot. But noise issues continue to plague the
neighborhood, residents have said, even though an acoustical engineer
found that noise from the mega-store wasn’t significant.
The eastern portion of the wall would have to be opened to allow
access to the site, which was a major sticking point with neighbors,
even though the same engineer found that opening a portion of it
would not cause significant noise. The wall would have to be opened
for any residential use on the site to allow access to the homes.
The project design is compatible with the character of the College
Park neighborhood and complies with the city’s residential design
guidelines, planning staff members said. It also exceeds the required
parking standards, as single-family homes usually require four
parking spaces, and Habitat’s homes will require five, Korando said.
The council will now have to weigh the benefit of adding more
affordable housing to the city’s stock with opposition from residents
and the Planning Commission, which feel the negatives outweigh the
positives.
“The Planning Commission has made a recommendation, and we take
those recommendations very seriously,” Mayor Gary Monahan said.
All the latest on Orange County from Orange County.
Get our free TimesOC newsletter.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Daily Pilot.