Teenagers face retrial on rape charges
Deepa Bharath
Three teenagers, including the son of an Orange County assistant
sheriff will be retried on rape charges, the Orange County district
attorney announced on Tuesday.
The jury, in what turned out to be a high-profile case spanning
two months, hopelessly deadlocked on Monday, forcing Judge Francisco
Briseno to declare a mistrial.
Prosecutors accused Greg Haidl, son of Orange County Assistant
Sheriff Don Haidl, Kyle Nachreiner and Keith Spann of raping an
unconscious 16-year-old girl and sexually assaulting her with various
objects including a Snapple bottle, a fruit juice can, a lighted
cigarette and a pool cue.
The prosecution’s key piece of evidence was a 20-minute digital
videotape the defendants had made of the July 5, 2002, incident that
reportedly occurred in Don Haidl’s Corona del Mar home.
Jurors deliberated for close to 15 hours, viewed the tape several
times and asked the judge questions about his instructions before
they sent a note to Briseno on Monday afternoon saying that they had
no hope of reaching a consensus.
Orange County District Attorney Tony Rackauckas said on Tuesday
that retrying the case “is a matter of getting justice for a victim.”
“We can’t tolerate conduct where a young woman is passed out and
people have sex with her unconscious body,” he said.
Rackauckas said he is “disappointed but not discouraged” by the
trial’s outcome.
“This kind of result in a trial is definitely a setback,” he said.
“But we need to proceed on the case and get positive results. We need
to send a message to other young men that just because a girl is
promiscuous that doesn’t give them the license to do what they want
to her.”
The girl, now 18 and identified during the trial only as Jane Doe,
testified for the prosecution during the trial. Defense attorneys
maintained that the girl was known in her circles for her promiscuity
and wild behavior and that she had sex with at least two of the
defendants a day before the incident. They said she came back the
next day for more sex and that she performed the acts willingly.
Greg Haidl’s lead attorney, Joseph Cavallo, said the district
attorney was refiling his case to salvage his faltering political
image.
“This case is not about some victim, who doesn’t exist,” he said.
“This case is all about Tony Rackauckas.”
But Rackauckas said he and his deputies believe Jane Doe was raped
and abused by the three teens.
“Jane Doe has suffered a great deal,” he said. “She’s telling us
she’ll do what it takes to get justice. She is willing to cooperate
with us.”
This has been an unusual case because of the tremendous power and
influence wielded by Don Haidl, who had access to the best attorneys
and resources money could buy, Rackauckas said.
“This is the most aggressive defense for name-calling and abuse
that I’ve ever seen,” the district attorney said. “That seems to be
their tactic, but we’re not going to take it lying down. We’ll face
up to it and prevail.”
Cavallo said he has not been as aggressive as he wanted to be
because he was working with a team of other attorneys involving two
other defendants.
“I held back a lot,” he said. “I’ve been the one that has been
personally attacked throughout this case, both by the district
attorney’s office and the media.”
Cavallo said the emotional case has bulldozed many lives and that
it will do the same damage all over again.
“Whether it’s severed or not, lives are ruined and people are
distraught,” he said.
Rackauckas said his office is taking a closer look at the case and
will make important decisions about the case, including whether to
drop some of the counts. The defendants faced 24 felony counts.
“The jury voted 11-1 to acquit on the first four counts,” he said.
“We’ll be taking a close look at those counts.”
But it’s too early to say whether the case will be watered down
the second time around, Rackauckas said.
Newport Beach Police, who investigated the case, will cooperate
with the district attorney to help retry the case, Sgt. Steve Shulman
said.
Defense attorneys criticized the Newport Beach Police Department,
saying that they conducted a sloppy investigation, fleshing out a
case where there was none.
Shulman said the case was legitimate.
“We believe the investigation was done well,” he said. “We don’t
know what the jury was thinking. But we don’t believe that our
investigation caused the mistrial. But if we learn later that it did,
then that’s something we could learn from.”
Rackauckas said despite the defense’s characterization of the tape
as incomplete and a copy, he believes that it’s still the smoking gun
in this case.
“The result of this trial doesn’t shake my belief in the
evidence,” he said. “The acts that are charged are caught on tape.
It’s hard for us to understand why the jury didn’t see it that way,
but as days go by, maybe it’ll become clearer. We’re just not there
yet.”
* DEEPA BHARATH covers public safety and courts. She may be
reached at (949) 574-4226 or by e-mail at [email protected].
All the latest on Orange County from Orange County.
Get our free TimesOC newsletter.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Daily Pilot.