City leaders fear state budget
Suzie Harrison and Andrew Edwards
Depending on who is looking at the picture, the canvas that Gov.
Arnold Schwarzenegger is painting with his proposed state budget has
caused mixed reactions.
“It is just horrible for Laguna,” said Mayor Cheryl Kinsman, a
certified public accountant.
Kinsman first heard Schwarzenegger’s proposal at a League of
Cities meeting she attended Jan. 8 with City Manager Ken Frank. The
speaker was a Sacramento Bee reporter who had attended the governor’s
press conference that afternoon. The information was published the
next day.
“This proposal will hurt us more than any other city in Orange
County,” Kinsman said. “We get the highest per-capita property tax in
the county. The city that receives the highest will lose the highest
amount.
Fortunately, she said, the city has been prudent and won’t go
bankrupt like some other cities might. Other cities have been
floating bonds, acquiring debt to pay for their projects, she said.
“We are almost -- not quite -- a debt-free city,” she said. “That
is extremely unusual. We are a financially sound city, but we will be
hurt by what is going on in Sacramento, severely hurt.”
Kinsman said the governor’s proposal will cost the city at least a
half-million dollars a year indefinitely.
Without property tax funds, city agencies could face cutbacks
across the board, and the city cannot afford to hire new employees.
“I’ll be recommending that all of our departments get some type of
reduction,” Frank said.
He said the city would not be able to fill vacancies for an
assistant director of community development and a police officer’s
job. He is expecting a reduction in police, fire and marine safety
services, as well in public works and planning.
The governor’s proposal comes just weeks after Schwarzenegger
appeased city leaders across the state by promising to return
revenues lost to local governments when he reduced the highly
unpopular Vehicle License Fee.
“It’s frustrating dealing with the state,” Frank said.
There’s a silver lining for the school district. Supt. Theresa
Daem seems optimistic as to how it will affect Laguna.
As a basic aid district, Laguna relies on property taxes for its
revenue. That revenue was threatened last year when Gov. Gray Davis
proposed to redirect some property taxes collected by basic aid
districts into state coffers. Those cuts would have meant a
$6-million reduction for Laguna schools. Schwarzenegger’s proposal
may cut deep into the city budget, but it leaves the basic aid funds
alone.
“It’s a thrill and a relief,” Daem said. “I’m really pleased that
this administration supports his efforts to work things out with
people, being optimistic to solve problems, as opposed to
adversarial.”
Assistant Supt. for Business Norma Shelton said that K-12
education has fared relatively well because the schools are not
proposed to receive the same reductions that they received last year.
“Last year, the state wanted to take away a portion of the local
property tax,” Shelton said. “That was the big issue -- this year
it’s not the case.”
Shelton said that Laguna’s local property taxes basically pay for
everything, and the state gives the district very little as far as
additional funding is concerned.
“The overall effect on Laguna Beach is status quo. We won’t face
further reductions at this point,” Shelton said. “The caveat to all
of this is if the March ballot or proposition for the $15-billion
bond is not passed, then none of this will work.”
The governor’s budget requires two-thirds approval by both houses
of the state Legislature before it is approved.
* BARBARA DIAMOND contributed to this story.
All the latest on Orange County from Orange County.
Get our free TimesOC newsletter.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Daily Pilot.