The city that sleeps first
Alex Coolman
Newport Beach, the sleepy town by the sea, becomes sleepier by the
day as its local spots for night life slowly fade out of business.
The Cannery Restaurant. Snug Harbor. Windows on the Bay. One by one
they drop out of the scene, leaving vacant storefronts and empty parking
lots.
For residents whose first priority is a good night’s rest, this is no
doubt a welcome development. But for the businesspeople whose livelihood
depends on entertainment -- not to mention the locals and tourists who
enjoy spending a night on the town -- the loss of area bars, clubs and
restaurants has raised a disconcerting question: Why, they ask, is it so
hard for nightlife to survive in Newport Beach?
For Bill Hamilton, the primary owner of The Cannery, the answer to
this question is troublingly easy to find. As far as he is concerned, the
fate of his business was sealed at a meeting in 1997, when the City
Council revoked his just-granted permit to allow dancing.
Hamilton made it clear at the time that the restaurant needed
entertainment revenue to survive, yet the city, reacting to protests from
The Cannery’s residential neighbors, ruled against him.
‘We had no entertainment, certainly no dancing permitted,” Hamilton
said. “And from that point on, our business went downhill.’
While The Cannery’s closure is clearly an event with complex causes --
construction on the Arches Bridge and competition from Fashion Island
also played a part in sinking Hamilton’s business, he says -- the city’s
role in the restaurant’s demise is conspicuous simply because The Cannery
is only the most recent in a string of bay-area entertainment venues
whose operations have been curtailed by local officials.
Windows on the Bay, once a popular and award-winning restaurant,
suffered the same fate as The Cannery earlier this year after significant
restrictions were placed on the hours the eatery could serve alcohol and
the manner in which it could use its bayfront patio, said Scott
Shuttleworth, the former Windows proprietor.
The restrictions included a 10 p.m. curfew on weekday patio service
and a ban on the use of stools at the bar. These regulations were added
despite the fact that police records showed only three complaints -- all
from the same household -- against Windows in the seven months before the
restrictions were added.
The restaurant lost about $400,000 in revenue from the measures,
Shuttleworth said, and ceased operations altogether Memorial Day.
“The net effect,” Shuttleworth said, “is you basically took an
upscale, award-winning restaurant and turned it into a weed farm.”
Other examples of entertainment venues that have been on the losing end
of city actions include the club Bacchus, shut down by the council in
1994; restaurants such as Joe’s Crab Shack, fined $100 in 1998 for its
waitresses’ excessively boisterous singing of ‘Happy Birthday’ to
patrons; eateries such as The Quiet Woman, where vice police presence has
created wary customers; and businesses, such as the financially troubled
Speedway Restaurant, where the conditional-use permit prohibits happy
hours, dancing, live entertainment and late-night patio service of
alcohol.
According to city officials, the closure of a few restaurants and
clubs says less about the atmosphere of the city in general than about
the realities of the volatile entertainment marketplace.
Mayor Dennis O’Neil emphasized the complexity of the economics
involved in situations like The Cannery’s.
“I suspect there’s a number of reasons why this wonderful place is no
longer going to be there,” O’Neil said. “It’d be nice to have a single
responsible party that we could all blame, but I don’t think we can do
that.”
Councilwoman Jan Debay voiced similar sentiments with regard to the
problems Shuttleworth encountered.
“I don’t think what happened through the city was the problem with
their business,” Debay said. “It was mainly timing with him. ... I’m not
sure because I can’t look at Scott’s books and tell you what happened.”
The perspective of the business people on the receiving end of the
city’s actions is, perhaps inevitably, rather different.
Rush Hill, the chairman of the civic affairs council for the Newport
Harbor Chamber of Commerce, resigned from his position as chairman of the
Newport Beach economic development committee in 1998 over what he called
“frustration in seeing the attitude of the city slowly change away from
supporting economic growth.”
Hill argued that the kind of restrictions placed on restaurants like
Windows on the Bay and The Cannery are problematic precisely because they
prevent businesses from coping with the challenges of the competition.
“‘The free marketplace was taken out of the equation,” Hill said.
“Those business owners were forced to operate with one arm tied behind
their back.
“The result is always the same. In the long run, they can’t do it.”
Hamilton and Shuttleworth agree that business has a tendency to
migrate away from Newport Beach because of the number of clubs in Costa
Mesa and other neighboring cities that offer live music and stay open
until 2 a.m.
Hill, along with Shuttleworth and other business owners who asked not
to be identified, argued that the city has moved away from a mixed-use
model of development -- where homes and businesses exist side by side --
toward a purely residential vision for the peninsula and harbor area.
The isolated commerce of Fashion Island, where orderly franchise
businesses dominate, is the alternative that the city, in Hill’s view,
seems to be favoring.
Despite that perception, there are a handful of businesses on the
bayfront that do offer nightlife and have been able to survive. Aysia
101, on West Coast Highway in Mariner’s Mile, is an upscale Asian food
restaurant that is a high-energy dance club on Fridays and Saturdays and
has a reggae band on Sundays.
James Raven, entertainment director for the restaurant, argued that
careful planning has allowed Aysia 101 to combine a vibrant night scene
with good community relations.
“The whole idea is to be responsible and proactive in what you do,”
Raven said. “You can anticipate the possible problems ahead of time and
go to your neighbors and alleviate the problems before they occur.”
O’Neil said he feels that “there are too many outlets on the peninsula
for the distribution, sale and consumption of alcohol,” but took
exception to the idea that any sort of plan exists to drive entertainment
out.
“If a place wanted to have live entertainment 24 hours a day and it
was done in a way that was not intrusive to the resident community ...
maybe they could get a permit for it,” O’Neil said. “I don’t know. I’m
really reluctant to generalize about it.”
The reality of doing business on the bayfront, however, is that the
residential communities -- specifically those of Lido Isle and Balboa
Island -- are organized, vocal and rarely enthusiastic about evening
noise. Proposals to expand or even maintain entertainment opportunities
at Windows and Speedway were met with flurries of protests from these
residents.
The mixed-use model of community, faced with such opposition, is
increasingly losing out, Shuttleworth said. The combination of homes and
entertainment is simply too volatile.
“I thought the term for that was ‘cosmopolitan,”’ he said. “New York
and Chicago seem to do very well with the mix, but maybe Newport Beach is
not ready to handle that.”
QUESTION: Footloose or fancy free? Is Newport Beach turning into
“Footloose” or are city regulations right on the mark?
All the latest on Orange County from Orange County.
Get our free TimesOC newsletter.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Daily Pilot.